Should the Electoral College be abolished?
Summary
The debate over abolishing the Electoral College centers on its constitutional role in electing the U.S. president. Critics argue it no longer serves its original purposes and can elect a president who loses the popular vote, leading to calls for a national popular vote system. Proponents, however, raise concerns that its removal could exacerbate threats to election legitimacy in close contests. A constitutional amendment would be required to abolish it, a measure that has seen historical attempts and varying levels of public and political support.
Arguments below are researched from cited sources and ranked by reader “Helpful” votes, most helpful first.
Supporting arguments
The Electoral College creates a risk that a candidate not favored by a majority of the people will be elected president.
Abolishing the Electoral College would ensure every citizen's vote is equal, regardless of their state of residence.
The Electoral College no longer serves its original purposes.
Switching to a majority vote would align the country's voting system with direct democracy.
How does this feel?
Rate this page — good, bad, or average — and tell us why if you want.